FAQs for Practitioners after the Michigan Supreme Court Ruling in People v Lockridge
In People v Lockridge, ___ Mich ___ (Docket No. 149073, 7/29/15), the Michigan Supreme Court concluded that the Michigan sentencing guidelines create a mandatory minimum sentence range that violates the rule of Apprendi v New Jersey, 530 US 466 (2000), and Alleyne v United States, 133 S Ct 2151 (2013), and thus violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, because the sentencing scheme uses judicial fact-finding in the scoring of the offense variables.
Learn how this decision affects felony sentencing in Michigan moving forward by reading Anne Yantus' Answers to Lockridge FAQs.
Current Articles
- Registration for the 2025 Appellate Writing Workshop now open!
- Safe & Just Michigan
- Misdemeanor sentencing: What are the non-jail and non-probation options?
- SADO is hiring a Deputy Director!
- Marilena David named Director of the State Appellate Defender Office
- Michigan Supreme Court vacates and remands in Kvasnicka
- Safe & Just Michigan
- MAACS Administrator Keeley Blanchard is named a Champion of Justice!
- SADO Attorney to argue before MSC in May
- Community service – Can we do better?
Subscriber Comments